Category Archives: Uncategorized

Apr 23, 2013

On Failing for Our Kids

risk-control

Every third Sunday at Tiny Church, we have guest musicians come in and play for the service. Our accompanist plays the hymns and leads the congregational singing, but the guest musicians play music at the beginning and end of the service, plus two pieces in the middle.

This past Sunday, my fourth grader was scheduled to be the guest musician. She chose four pieces she knew well, and for a week prior, she practiced them to flawlessness.

And on Sunday… well, who can say how it happened. She’d been to three birthday parties that weekend and as an introvert was peopled out, perhaps. She was tired. She didn’t have a good breakfast. I don’t know. But she got an attack of stage fright the likes of which I’ve never seen in her. No pep talk could snap her out of it.

She is old enough to be aware of what I write here, so the details are between her and those of us in Tiny Church. Let me just say that she made it through the first piece beautifully.

Robert took her out afterward so she could compose herself, and I went right into the call to worship. It’s one of the most uncomfortable moments of ministry I’ve ever had. I wanted to be with her, but I had a job to do.

Since then she’s talked to her parents, her grandparents, and her piano teacher about what happened. We’ve laughed about the fact that no matter where people start, every last one of us concludes with the same expression: Get back on the horse.

Myself, I was flummoxed about the whole thing. What brought this on? Then I remembered playing The Baker’s Wife in a college production of Into the Woods. It was a fantastic experience, but very intense—several nights of performances, but with the same classload and homework as always. My worst performance of the entire run was when my dad was in the audience. My Dad was never one of those hyper-critical, impossible to please types. Still, I so wanted to do a good job that night. But my timing was off, my voice sounded terrible, and realizing this just made me sieze up even further.

Remember when I said intense? One of the RAs found me outside, crying uncontrollably between scenes.

Oh.

So what’s a perfectionist raising a perfectionist to do?

I told her later that I wished I’d asked the congregation for a show of hands: how many of you have experienced stage fright? Or nervousness at doing something new? And let her see the sea of hands. Surely everyone would raise a hand, except people who a) are lying or b) have never challenged themselves.

It’s probably just as well that I didn’t do that, because it would’ve put her on the spot. Plus, I don’t think kids get it. They don’t get that adults had (and have) fears and phobias. Adults must seem so… competent to kids. Sure, kids see us lose our cool; they see us spill the cereal and scrape the car door against the garage. But mainly, they see us succeed. Hold down a job. Set a goal and meet it. Be where we’re supposed to be, more or less on time.

I read a lot of stuff about parenting, and of the many critiques of helicopter parenting—and there are many, and rightfully so—the most significant is that it doesn’t serve kids well. Children don’t learn resilience when we’re always smoothing things over for them. But I also wonder whether resilience gets built when children witness adults taking risks. I don’t mean stupid risks (no cooking meth in your basement). But I don’t mean cute risks either (taking a ballroom dancing class). I mean real, authentic, bowel-quivering risk.

Maybe just letting them in on the risks we do take would help. Every night at dinner, we do a modified examen with our kids—we all share our most and least grateful moments (framed as most/least favorite when they were younger). Often my least grateful moment is something in the news, or concern for someone who’s sick. It’s less often that I share about the rejection letter I received, or the withering comment that came when I stuck my neck out about something. But maybe those moments are important for children to witness.

Of course, parents should provide a sense of stability and security for their kids. We don’t want to come off as capricious. But the world our children are inheriting is a world of rapid change. The roles and rules are not spelled out. People who can conquer their own fear of the unknown, take risks, and shrug off disappointment will be much better off in life.

On Sunday I said to Caroline, “You were really scared, you tried something hard, and you didn’t die.” Let me be clear that I do not think she failed. But maybe children need to see us fail. Or more to the point, maybe they need to see us fail and not die.

Sep 18, 2012

New Website

The banner for SabbathInTheSuburbs.com

Hi there folks,

Chalice Press and I have launched a new website for the book, SabbathInTheSuburbs.com, found here.

(A friend of mine scanned that address and thought it said “Sabbath Thin.” Is that like a wheat thin, she asked? :-) )

Right now I’m updating the book site every day until launch, which is September 30. So I’ll be blogging a little less here. After launch, I’ll be posting both here and there, but less frequently—maybe once or twice a week in each place.

The Blue Room will continue to be the place for random stuff that flits around in my head, and of course, Friday Link Love. The book site will touch on Sabbath topics more specifically.

I’m hoping not to feel too splinched by this. I’m trying to think of it as a summer home and a winter home!

Thanks, as always, for reading. It’s an honor to have the gift of your time, attention, and thoughtfulness.

May 8, 2012

Speaking of North Carolina… A Repost

This was the second post I wrote on The Blue Room, related to Prop 8 in California. It relates a bit to what’s going on down in North Carolina.

———-

Nothing like tackling a controversial issue on the second day of a new blog!

I’m not going to say much about Judge Walker’s decision declaring California’s gay-marriage ban unconstitutional. But I am thinking about a few things today.

I remember seven years ago this summer, going to the Fairfax County Courthouse to get authorized to perform weddings in the Commonwealth of Virginia. In accordance with Virginia law, I had to fill out a form, get a letter from my presbytery saying I was a minister in good standing, pay $30, and take an oath. I remember walking out of the courthouse afterwards, calling Robert and laughing: “Hey! I’ve got the ‘power vested in me’ now!”

Something about that whole transaction felt very, very strange to me at the time. It seemed quite odd that I, a minister called by God and ordained to serve a local congregation, was now in effect performing a service on behalf of the state… that a couple whose wedding I officiated would not be legally married until I signed the license and sent it back to the county.

I remember when Robert and I went to get our marriage license (sixteen years ago!), the clerk asked us a long list of questions that we had to answer with “I do” and the like. As bureaucratic processes go, it was unexpectedly moving. Almost… liturgical? We left, and one of us said to the other, Did we just get married? Because it kinda feels like we did. Hey, if only we’d kissed afterwards, we could have saved everyone a lot of time and money…

This was in Texas, where I’ve also performed weddings, but unlike Virginia, there were no legal hoops to jump through beforehand. I’ve often wondered why Texas doesn’t vet its clergy like Virginia does. Could it be that Texas’s requirements and processes for getting a marriage license are more stringent, making the credentials of the officiant less relevant? I haven’t gotten a marriage license in Virginia so I have no idea. I hope one of my smart readers has some info about this.

The point is this, however: seven years ago, when I got ordained, I had not given much thought to the nuances of how gay marriage could or would be enacted from a policy perspective. But it seems clear to me now, as many others have said, that we need to separate the religious service of marriage from its civil aspects. I believe it is the only way forward, and it also gets clergy out of this agent-of-the-state weirdness. Even some of the opponents to gay marriage acknowledge that the legal rights of partnership should not be denied to same-sex couples.

I’m thinking about a couple whose wedding I recently officiated. I woke up the morning of their wedding rehearsal with a start, realizing that I hadn’t said anything to them in our premarital counseling about getting a marriage license. It isn’t my job to remind them, but usually it comes up, and I tell them to bring their paperwork to the service, if not the rehearsal, so I can sign it.

At the rehearsal I mention this to the groom and he says, “Oh, we’re actually not planning to get a marriage license. We really don’t care what our status is with the government. What matters to us is that our union be blessed by God.”

Now, inside I’m thinking, This is a really, really bad idea. This couple already has children together, and let’s face it, there are tangible benefits to being “officially” married… which of course is a big part of why gay persons are fighting for this civil right. And I told some friends afterward about this and several suggested that they probably already were married and either didn’t want their family to know, or wanted the imprimatur of the church on their union. I also felt a little put out: then what am I doing here? Play-acting? Fake marrying?

Later I realized: they cared more about the liturgical and sacramental aspects of marriage than the legal ones. Isn’t that something? What I was doing there was not play-acting, but what I as a clergyperson am supposed to do: to ask God’s blessing on the union between two people, to pray for their welfare, and to support them as they pledge their lives to one another.

And whatever legal/contractual arrangement they have with one another, as important and beneficial as that is, is a separate issue entirely.

What do you think?

Apr 3, 2012

On “Fat” and Loving Our Bodies

Barbie proportions drawn on the beautiful body of a "plus sized" model.

As you all know, Project Fitness has been in full swing in our house. Collectively, Robert and I have lost 64 pounds over the last several months. As much as possible, we have emphasized strength and health over scale and waistline, particularly when speaking in front of our kids. Especially our girls. We know the stats, and the risks when it comes to eating disorders and self-punishing behaviors. We are well aware of our culture’s dysfunction when it comes to weight and ideals of beauty. And we hope beyond hope that we’re framing this weight-loss journey in a nourishing and positive way for our kids. We don’t restrict what they eat. But we talk about good choices. We’re reducing dessert size and frequency and are doing a lot of biking, hiking and other stuff as a family.

But I find it all very confusing. I have had lots of people tell me I look “amazing.” I appreciate it and understand that they are affirming my hard work. But sometimes the gushing gets to be a little much. I’m not doing this to look awesome. I’m doing this to be awesome. And strong. And 40 and fabulous and all that Oprah stuff. I’m doing it to be marathon-ready, because even if I never run a marathon, a long life is a marathon all its own.

So part of me responds to all this affirmation by thinking, My God, did I look terrible before? And if I did, why didn’t anyone tell me?

A friend of mine posted this great article to Facebook, called ‘Mom, I’m Fat’: One Mother’s Response to Her 7 Year Old. I applaud this mother’s persistence in not letting the moment go. And I loved the novel way she handled this particular encounter. But before she gets to the big Woman Power Moment, one bit stood out to me:

[My daughter] tells me on two different occasions friends have called her “kind of fat” when they were talking about bodies this summer in their bathing suits.  And she felt sad.  But she also felt good because finally she confirmed that what she thought about her body was “mostly true”.

The thrust of the mother’s approach seems to be to try to erase the word “fat” from her daughter’s self-concept. Now, I have no idea whether her daughter is, in fact, fat. But let’s just assume for the sake of argument that she is heavier than average, and that when her friends called her ‘kind of fat,’ that her daughter recognized something true about herself. That’s possible, isn’t it? Isn’t it possible that our kids, especially young kids, view fat and thin as relatively objective, non-loaded descriptors of different body types? Isn’t it possible that our kids have not yet accumulated all of the baggage that we have? (Pun intended.) And isn’t it further possible that our unwillingness to use the F word actually contributes to a negative self-image and dysfunctional attitudes about our bodies because it suggests that fat is shameful?

You’d have to suss all that out as a parent, of course: how much is your child picking up ridiculous Barbie ideals and how much is she simply looking at reality in the mirror? But if you’re dealing with a child who is, in fact, heavy, doesn’t it seem more honest, and in the long run, healthier not to try to convince her that really, her tummy is as flat as anyone else’s? Doesn’t it seem healthier to say that yes, she IS heavier than average, AND [not BUT] she is strong and normal and beautiful?

I don’t remember having a lot of conversations with my parents about my body when I was a kid. But I was well aware of being chunkier than most of my friends. I was pretty strong, too, though not all that athletic. And that’s OK. I did a lot of other things well and was talented in other areas. So now I’m just imagining myself in the same situation as the article, asking my mother whether my tummy was big. (It was.) I know what she would have said, out of absolute unconditional love—the same thing the mother in the article said, which is “Honey, you’re perfect.” And a child might hear that and think, I know I am. But that’s not what I was asking.

Here is what I’m saying. “Fat” has become such a dirty word that we’ve become unwilling to use it at all. I’m not advocating calling people names, of couse, least of all our children. I’m saying it’s time to reclaim “Fat,” to use the word again and strip it of its shameful subtext. Because until we do that, we are not empowering the girls and women who are overweight and who know it.

Again, I’m not talking about slim girls suffering from a distorted picture of themselves. I’m saying, let’s describe reality for one another AND love ourselves at the same time.

So… maybe I was a little fat before Project Fitness. So what? I gave birth to three children, for Pete’s sake. I nursed them, carried them around on my hip and my back and my shoulders. I fed them, leaned over changing tables and bathtubs and high chairs, hoisted strollers and diaper pails. Meanwhile I served two congregations and wrote a book.

And I climbed the mountain.

Blessed be.

Dec 2, 2011

Friday Link Love

Happy Friday:

~

Hallelujah Chorus — Quinhagak, Alaska (YouTube)

I can’t hear that piece without crying (big sap), and there’s something exuberantly wonderful about what this little Alaskan village has done with it.

~

Leonardo’s To-Do List — Robert Krulwich

Minds that break free, that are compelled to wander, can sometimes achieve more than those of us who are more inhibited, more orderly, the study suggests. Or, as Jonah chose to put it, there are “unexpected benefits of not being able to focus.”

~

Ten Church Models for a New Generation — Carol Merritt

Neo-monastic communities, art churches, podcast churches… beautiful, generative stuff here. Love it.

~

Waking Up Our Internal Teacher — Lines Ballet

This is just a really compelling video. Beautiful dance, interesting words about the creative process.

~

Why the Second Mile Matters — Call and Response Blog

Thomas L. Day is an Iraq war veteran, a Catholic, a Penn State graduate and participated in Jerry Sandusky’s Second Mile program. In a recent op-ed in the Washington Post, Day names the Penn State fiasco as the final straw to his loss of faith. Age 31, Day has lost faith in the church, the banking system, the court system, the military, the government and all of their public leaders.

Jesus, somewhere around age 30, had a crisis of faith as well. We see his op-ed in Matthew 5:38-42…

~

How Children’s ‘Play’ is Being Sneakily Re-defined — Alfie Kohn, Washington Post

The typical American kindergarten now resembles a really bad first-grade classroom. Even preschool teachers are told to sacrifice opportunities for imaginative play in favor of drilling young children until they master a defined set of skills.

~

Be Thankful for Government — Daily Kos

A little late for Thanksgiving…

Thanks for the safety of the air we breathed. On Thanksgiving week in 1939, the area where I live was shrouded in a smog so thick that day and night were the same. Street lights glowed in the gloom of noon, and people passed out just walking along their sidewalks. This week we looked out on beautiful blue skies and the only smell in the air was the last autumnal hint of fallen leaves. For that I thank the Clean Air Act signed by John Kennedy in 1963 and the expansions of that law that came later, including the one Nixon had the sense to sign in 1970. I thank that same legislation for the beautiful woodlands out my window, woods that could easily have have died from pollution, acid rain, and disease were it not for the legislation that protects them.

Thankful for you all, dear readers and friends. Have a good weekend…